The medical model emphasizes exclusively

The medical model emphasizes exclusively on treating specific physical diseases and concerned with resolving wellness problems and does not emphasize prevention. The holistic model of health is defined by the 1947 WHO definition as a state of complete physical, mental and social upbeat and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. The holistic model integrates the medical model prospect and also introduced the idea of positive health.The social epidemiologic model of health focus on individualist level measures, or on emergent social properties that have no correlation at the individual level.The social epidemiologic model overlaps with social sciences like medical sociology and medical geography (Krieger 2002, p. 698).(2. )The debate amidst alternative and conventional medicines can be quite convincing but leaves those who are not aware(predicate) of this issue to be either dangerously ignorant or confused. Thus, the encounter of science on the ski tow of conventional (AMA) medicine put at stake human health and human lives. According to the American Medical Association, the fourth leading cause of death in America is the use of prescription drugs.It accounts for reactions to drugs that were correctly prescribed and reported cases. Thus, the exact and precise figure is undoubtedly far worse.(3. ) The main difference betwixt modern and alternative traditional feeleres is that the modern approach focuses on the cause of the ailment (Magar 2009). The modern approach concentrates on factors causing the disease, remedies and deal with abnormality as an independent entity. The alternative approach often opposes evidence-based serve and including therapies with an historical or cultural basis, but not scientific basis.(4. ) The wellness lifestyles can yield an impact on the lives of individuals. Thus, the wellness lifestyles can be made into a sociological concept given that at that place is a rising interest in health, fitness and well-being as an individual concern and a parallel concern of organizations, communities and nations (Schuster et al. 2004, p. 357-367).(5. ) Cassidy (1995) notes that the two effigys namely reductionism (used by bioscientists) and holism (used by alternative healthcare) are hostile to the ways of biomedicine and CAM.This distinction relates to problems in CAM because the two paradigms reflect two different ways of constructing reality in the society. Thus, the integration of CAM into medicine results to therapies of CAM adopted by medicine without the needed philosophical elements.(6. ) RCT has an issue of internal lustiness versus external validity. Most RCT designs have high validity based on reductionist scientific paradigm but have low external validity due to misrepresentation of the holistic essence of homeopathy. homeopathy is a popular form of alternative medicine.(7. ) The choice of outcome measures should match the CAM intervention by twinned the desired outcomes of the key particip ants and its validity in terms of measuring what it intends to measure in the study as a form of quality assurance.(8. ) The limitation of RCT is that it lacks qualitative measurement of data (Verhoef, 2002). The limitations of RCT with regard to research on CAM are that it is ineffective in testing more than one hypothesis and is an inappropriate model to adjudicate the effectiveness of homeopathy.(9.) The outcome research in CAM can have another alternative to RCT when research uses randomise controlled trials to test in efficacy of the medicines used in homeopathy.(10. ) The most important concept I erudite from writing this paper is that models of health greatly differ from each other in terms of their single approaches and goals. The difference of the models of health possesses the same subject of either conventional or alternative medicines. Works Cited Krieger N. A glossary for social epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. Oct 200155(10)693-700. Reprinted in Epidemio logical Bulletin, Vol. 23 No. 1, March 2002